
Editing
Recognising a structural problem in a manuscript
Look beyond individual sentences when readers cannot follow the manuscript’s central movement, even though they understand its separate parts.
Editing
A focused scene audit follows the immediate aim, the resistance it meets and the situation left behind.

Read the scene once without marking the prose. Then write a sentence describing what the central participant wants during this particular encounter. “To be happy” is usually too broad to guide an audit. “To persuade her brother to hand over the workshop key before the buyer arrives” identifies an immediate aim and a limit on the opportunity.
Next, describe what interferes. Resistance may come from another person, an incomplete understanding, a physical condition or the participant's own divided wishes. It need not take the form of an argument. A person trying to apologise may face a listener who is perfectly courteous but refuses to remain alone with them.
Trace the changes in available information and possible action. At what point does the participant revise a tactic, realise an assumption was wrong or accept a cost? Mark those moments briefly. If the scene contains a great deal of activity but no meaningful change, consider whether it is performing a necessary different function or simply repeating an established situation.
An illustrative scene about returning a borrowed instrument might begin with the owner expecting an apology for its damage. During the exchange, she discovers that the borrower used it to keep a promised performance from collapsing. Her anger need not disappear. The new information can change the terms of the conversation and force a more difficult decision about trust.
Describe the situation at the end separately from the outcome the participant wanted. Success can bring an unexpected obligation; failure can reveal a better route. A scene's contribution often lies in this altered situation rather than in whether a request was granted.
Return to the prose and locate the evidence for your description. If you say the participant changes tactics, where does that become visible? If the scene turns on a discovery, can the reader recognise its significance? A private explanation in your notes does not establish the change on the page.
Check the physical sequence too. Readers need enough orientation to understand consequential actions. An object should be available before someone uses it, and a character's departure should make sense within the space. You need not catalogue the room. Select the details that allow the important movements to be followed.
Finally, consider the scene's relationship to its neighbours. What does it receive from the preceding material, and what does it make possible afterward? A scene that is vivid in isolation may be redundant in sequence. Conversely, a quiet scene may be essential because it establishes the agreement a later event will break.
Use the audit to choose one or two revisions with clear purposes. Add the missing response, remove a repeated exchange or sharpen the decision at the end. Preserve material that creates the desired experience even if it does not fit a tidy formula. The audit supplies questions for reading; the particular scene supplies the answers.